Saturday, January 13, 2007

Short Article on Thomas Pynchon

This appeared in the current issue of the New Haven Advocate. (They didn't put it into their online edition, so I am posting it here.) The title isn't mine, but I can't think of a better one.

by Gregory Feeley

A month after its long-awaited publication, Thomas Pynchon’s sixth and longest novel has received a problematic reception. Early reviews were sharply mixed, with a publication-day savaging from the New York Times’s notorious scold Michiko Kakutani, who called it “a humongous, bloated jigsaw puzzle of a story, pretentious without being provocative . . . complicated without being rewardingly complex,” followed by a longer, more astute appreciation by Sunday reviewer Liesl Schillinger, who hailed it as “his funniest and arguably his most accessible novel.” If it is not hovering low on the best sellers’ list, as Pynchon’s previous few novels had managed in their first weeks of publication, it has nonetheless enjoyed a fierce, if focused, attention: a Wiki site devoted exclusively to its mysteries was launched the day the novel appeared, burgeoning with glosses and annotations that grow by the day.

In fact, both Times critics are wrong: Against the Day is not a pretentious mess, nor is it the best entry point for readers new to his work (The Crying of Lot 49, scarcely a tenth the current novel’s size, is surely that). Its tremendous length – the 1,085 pages hold nearly half a million words – encompasses something like half a dozen plot lines, most spooling off from a murder of a Colorado anarchist in 1900 by union-busting mine owners and his various children’s attempts to avenge or come to terms with it. Numerous reviews have mentioned the multiplicity of narratives and enormous cast, and all have noted its succession of exotic locales (and no surprise: the jacket copy, written by Pynchon, colorfully emphasizes it).

As reviewers have also mentioned, Against the Day shares many features with earlier Pynchon novels. The underrated Vineland had a comic subplot involving a Japanese monster attacking a city; Against the Day features a much stranger and melancholy tale of an indefinable (and, strangely, soon forgotten) monster devastating New York City. Gravity’s Rainbow opposed the arc of nature’s rainbow with the malign trajectory of the V-2 rocket; Against the Day plays off both metaphors. The nineteenth-century fancy of a hollow Earth, which figures in Mason & Dixon, reappears (to even stranger effect) in Against the Day.

More significantly, the vivid central image of Mason & Dixon – its protagonists’ boundary line conceived as a gash upon the Earth’s being, the imposition of unnatural linearity upon the complex topography of the living Earth – is evoked repeatedly in the new novel, where numerous man-made features – mine shafts, state lines, railroads – are presented as industrial capitalism’s violations of nature. (The name of the murdered anarchist, Webb Traverse, embodies this tension between linearity and an organic interrelatedness.)

What no one has mentioned is how profoundly this vision seems indebted to a much older writer, one whom Pynchon’s postmodern fans have probably never read: D.H. Lawrence. It may seem peculiar even to mention the hectoring and deeply unfashionable Lawrence, who since the Sixties has been excoriated (somewhat unfairly, if only somewhat) as a male supremacist and proto-fascist. But Pynchon is a child of the Fifties, not the Sixties, and the Fifties saw Lawrence as an apostle of sexual liberation and heroic opposition to the dehumanizing power of modern society and industrial capitalism. The opening chapters of his 1915 novel The Rainbow, which dramatize the sundering of the Brangwens’ farmland by the first railroad lines, sees a powerful echo in Pynchon’s scene of Traverse selecting and then blowing up a railway bridge that cut through the countryside and people’s lives.

Lawrence’s biographer John Worthen has noted that what Lawrence’s contemporaries found radical and upsetting about his work was how it “centered on articulating the experiences of the body,” and this characterizes Pynchon’s work as well. Lawrence and Pynchon are profoundly different writers – Lawrence could be pretty humorless, while Pynchon is as comic a writer as Joyce – but the Lawrence who wrote in 1914 that “You mustn’t look in my novel for the old stable ego of the character” is a writer with whom the author of Gravity’s Rainbow – whose protagonist in the end simply dissolves into the landscape – possesses important (and overlooked) affinities.

Pynchon’s novel opens with a scene of high-spirited airship-flying young men – the Chums of Chance – soaring through the clouds, a parody of the boys’ adventure novels (such as The Airship Boys Due North) of the early twentieth century, which Pynchon relates in the actual style of those old novels. This tactic was first used in Into the Aether, a 1974 novel by Richard Lupoff, but Pynchon’s use of it is considerably more original and complex.

Lecturing at Cornell in the Fifties, Vladimir Nabokov noted that the fantastical scenes in the Nighttown episode in Ulysses could not be explained as the hallucinations of any character or combination of characters, but represented something strikingly more free-form: “The book is itself dreaming and having visions.” Pynchon was one of Nabokov’s students, and the strangest, most disconcerting aspect of his later novels – that some scenes are set in a different universe than others – may have had their inspiration here. The Chums of Chance, like the indeterminate monster and other bizarre creations, inhabit a different reality than the rest of the novel, and until the reader realizes this, he will vainly try to reconcile Pynchon’s painstakingly researched evocation of pre-World War I America with an alternate universe in which people used airships like roadsters.

Much of Pynchon’s novel is a good deal easier than this: Schillinger is right to emphasize its humor, and to observe that Pynchon can be “uncharacteristically earnest” when treating political matters. (Various characters, including Traverse’s youngest son Kit, must deal with the system’s attempts to co-opt them, which Pynchon describes – “Despite having gone in with a determination to cut the place some slack, Kit had seen Yale almost immediately for what it was” – with unconcealed disdain.)

How good the novel is – whether it will be remembered, like Gravity’s Rainbow and Mason & Dixon, as one of the great American novels of our time – is a judgment no one can make after a single reading, and I certainly have not yet gone through its thousand pages twice. Richer and more various than any six novels you are likely to encounter, Against the Day requires a significant investment of time and energy. Like exploring a new continent, it promises to exhaust you at times, leave you feeling lost, and show you some things you have never seen before.


Blogger Scraps said...

I note that a reader can get a quick (if possibly inaccurate) idea of how you view every Pynchon novel except V. Not quite as great as Mason & Dixon?

When Kakutani says "pretentious", she means "aiming over my head".

6:22 PM  
Blogger Gregory Feeley said...

As impressive as V. is, I think that Pynchon's other novels all do things it did not. Lot 49's prose, for example, is closer to that of his subsequent novels than it is to V.'s.

6:32 PM  
Blogger E said...

A thoughtful and well-written review, and I laughed out loud at this line:

>one whom Pynchon’s postmodern fans have probably >never read: D.H. Lawrence.

cause it's true of me, a postmodern Pynchon fan.

As a major contributor to the Pynchon wiki, I think that we wiki contributors have somehow stumbled upon the ideal way to read ATD, and perhaps unwittingly discovered the key to unlocking all of his works: to view them less as novels in the conventional sense so much as either 1) records of Pynchon's titanic autodidactism (his own version of The Education of Henry Adams, a work he has repeatedly mentioned with approval), his quest to explore the English language in all its variations (hence the grand prose experiment of M&D and the various genre costumes of ATD) and learn everything about everything, or 2) rubrics for our self-education. Perhaps both.

By this long-winded explanation I mean that unless you look up all or many of the references, you will gain little pleasure from ATD. Perhaps even miss its point entirely. I suspect this caused much of the polarization in the early reviews, as some readers took the time to look even the major stuff up (Tesla, Colorado, etc), while other plowed on miserably through to make deadlines, perhaps forcing their eyes over pages that mercilessly add more and more information for the reader to look up on his own.

So perhaps the wiki and the understanding that readers cannot read ATD like any other self-contained novel will result in a second, subtler round of reviews in the near future. Whether the ultimate concesus will be any different, though, is too soon to say.

10:43 PM  
Blogger John Burgess said...

I've always believed it a serious error to read Pynchon as a post-modernist writer. He certainly uses elements of post-modernism, but his mentions of the masters of that realm are actually pretty negative.

I'm only about 3/4 through ATD and find it among his better works (there aren't actually any bad ones, IMO).

I think either Vineland or V. a better starting point for Pynchon, though. Lot 49 is certainly easier to read, but when seen against his other books, it's very unrepresentative; it only hints at what's to come.

9:38 AM  
Blogger FP said...

I gave up on page 700. Provisionally. I think that strikes people as "postmodernist" about ATD is that the various alternate worlds - the obscure "T.W.I.T" conspiracy, the hollow earth, etc. - seem to exist for their own sake. That is, for the thin delight of recognizing sources, and the dreamlike pleasure of floating away from causality (or replacing it with a multitude of intersecting conspiracies). 20+ years ago, when I read Gravity's Rainbow, I couldn't put it down till I had finished. I felt it had a structural and a moral arc, into which the various digressions (about the history of the zoot suit, the "Zone" in 1945 and so on) ultimately joined. The main character, the much-abused Slothrop, had depth - paradoxically, since the whole novel was about his de(con)struction. In ATD the issue of Justice for Traverse seems a pretext. The characters are tenuous and - because of the numerous environments they interact with - static. The element that interested me was Tesla and the promise of cheap energy and the plutocrats' conspiracy against it. But by page 700 that had been either forgotten or too much deferred, and - to my taste - not sufficiently related to the Traverse family. The larger issue raised by Pynchon's progress from GR to ATD is that of political/spiritual hope, and what kind of art can be made when it is absent. I know this problem first-hand. I once wrote a book-length poem (Greg reviewed it) about The Revolution occurring by means, essentially, of magic, and I wrote it on a knife-edge between hope and despair. One day I'll probably finish those last 367 pages of ATD ... but actually I'm afraid of being left (as most postmodernist art leaves me) with a sour shrug.

2:16 PM  
Blogger Gregory Feeley said...

Like Frederick Pollack, I am very uncertain about how successful Against the Day truly is. I find it as charged with moral urgency as any work of Pynchon’s, but it does indeed feel diffuse and overlong at times, even slackly sentimental. I don’t know that “Justice for Traverse” is a pretext, but the theme can seem at times like a desperate unifying device. (I suppose that is close enough to a “pretext.”) Gravity’s Rainbow does seem likely to remain his greatest novel.

But parts of Against the Day are extraordinarily beautiful, and I can’t imagine getting as far as Frederick did and not finishing it. I hope this remains Pynchon’s longest novel, however.

2:11 PM  
Blogger Adi said...

Get the lates information of Electronics Gadgets Tech gadgets Cool Gadgets New Gadgets Best Gadgets Latest Gadgets Cool New Gadgets</a

4:26 PM  
Blogger 2010 Wedding Dresses said...

thanks for your sharing! great helpful!!!Thank you
Louboutin Shoes 
Christian Louboutin Shoes
Christian Louboutin Pumps 
Christian Louboutin Boots 
Christian Louboutin Pumps
Christian Louboutin Heels 
Christian Louboutin Sandal
Pigalle Christian Louboutin 
christian louboutin studded bow
halter neck wedding dresses
louboutin pink bow studded heels
christian louboutin fur boots
loubitan studded bow peep
christian louboutin studded bow peep-toes
christian louboutin studded heels with bow
christian louboutin white shoes with bow
Wedding Dress Shops
vintage wedding dresses 
wedding dresses
cheap mobile phone
Wedding Dress Shops
Wedding Dresses 2011
Wedding Dress Shops
Off the Shoulder Wedding Dresses
bridal jackets
wedding jackets for the bride
loubitan studded bow peep
bridal jackets
wedding jackets for the bride
halter neck wedding dresses

10:46 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

michael kors outlet
ferragamo outlet
michael kors uk
canada goose outlet
christian louboutin outlet
champion clothing
toms shoes
jimmy choo sunglasses
tag heuer watches
oakley sunglasses wholesale

12:00 AM  
Blogger Zihan Amelia said...

Permission to share articles about health and hopefully useful for all

Cara Ampuh Mengatasi Tinnitus
Cara Mencegah Demensia Atau Pikun
Cara Mengatasi Menstruasi Yang Tidak Lancar
Obat Penyakit Hipertiroid

8:35 PM  
Blogger Lutfi Kurniawan said...

Subhanallah..simple analogy but deep meaning. something we know but we never realized, opened my mind and heart. Cara Menghilangkan Bruntusan Di Wajah Cara Melancarkan Haid Obat Pilek Cara Mengatasi Gejala Tipes

10:45 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home